BDI and BOID Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this discussion paper we are interested in the role of argumentation in the context of cognitive BDI and BOID agents, i.e., agents whose deliberation is based on beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires. We discuss argumentation issues for single agent deliberation, multiagent dialogues, and interaction between agents and their normative system. For each category we discuss examples and we give a personal view on their formalization.
منابع مشابه
Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework
In this paper we use formal argumentation theory to study the deliberation cycle of the BOID cognitive agent architecture. We combine goal generation with a planning approach recently proposed by Leila Amgoud. In her formal argumentation framework plans for fulfilling a desire are represented just like arguments that support a conclusion; the framework can thus deal with conflicting desires. In...
متن کاملPractical Reasoning in an Argumentation-based Decision BDI Agent: a Case Study for Participatory Management of Protected Areas
This paper describes the implementation of an argumentation system used for participatory management of environmental protected areas, more precisely to model the decision of a park manager artificial agent. This implementation is based on a BDI agent architecture, namely the Jason/AgentSpeak framework/language. After introducing the principles of BDI architecture and of argumentation systems, ...
متن کاملAgent Decision Making Using Argumentation About Actions
In this paper we consider how a BDI agent might determine its best course of action. We draw on previous work which has presented a model of persuasion over action and extends the account of Walton. We propose a formalism based upon this model which extends the BDI agent architecture to include the notion of value functions. This enables us to make use of an argumentation framework in order to ...
متن کاملAn approach to integrate web services and argumentation into a BDI system
Intelligent agents have to be provided with different skills and technological resources in order to deal with highly changing environments, uncertain, incomplete and potentially inconsistent information and bounded computational resources. BDI architectures, argumentation-based techniques and recent technologies like web services have been incorporated in the design of intelligent agents to ad...
متن کاملDefeasible Argumentation Support for an Extended BDI Architecture
In this work, an agent architecture that combines defeasible argumentation and the BDI model is described. Argumentation will be used as a mechanism for reasoning about beliefs, for filtering desires considering the agent’s current environment, and for selecting proper intentions. The approach allows to define different types of agents and this will affect the way in which desires are filtered ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003